Match quality stalls at scale.
What worked at ten thousand seekers stops working at five hundred thousand. Embeddings drift, BM25 alone misses intent, and one bad reranker tanks a market.
AI matching for the platforms that move millions of people into work. Vector retrieval, eval suites, multilingual career copilots, and the boring infrastructure that keeps a recommender running at half a million seekers.
We have watched these patterns in conglomerate-backed marketplaces, independent talent platforms, and university-affiliated career portals. The shape is the same.
The fix is not a better demo. The fix is the boring infrastructure underneath the demo. Eval gates, hybrid retrieval, cost meters, and the discipline to refuse a model that does not pass.
What worked at ten thousand seekers stops working at five hundred thousand. Embeddings drift, BM25 alone misses intent, and one bad reranker tanks a market.
Conglomerate-backed platforms get asked about hallucination, fairness, and uptime in the same meeting as revenue. Without an eval bar, the answer is always a story.
Early-stage platforms lock in vector stores, model providers, and retrieval shapes that they will live with for three years. The wrong call costs a rebuild, not a refactor.
Each item is a focused engagement: eight weeks, fixed scope, eval suite at handoff. Bundle two or three when the problem warrants.
The retrieval + ranking stack your platform runs on. Built to survive the launch and the next million users.
The number that turns 'AI reliability' from a board worry into an engineering metric. Gated on every release.
A career chat that holds context across multi-turn conversations and switches between English and the local language without losing the thread.
Resume parsing, skill graphs, and explainable ranking that gives recruiters a 'why this candidate' for every match.
Cost-per-match metering, latency p95 per market, and quality-drift dashboards. The CFO sees the same numbers as the on-call.
One-week audit of your retrieval stack, eval gate, model selection, and deployment shape. Written decisions you can defend to a board.
Most engagements bundle two: a build (01, 03, 04) paired with the discipline that keeps it shipping (02, 05). Bring the shape closest to your blocker.
Scope your engagement →Want to see the K-Framework discipline behind every item? Read the K-Framework.
We pick the simplest tool that survives the audit. Most of the time that means Postgres, the model API, and your existing infra.
The store, the index, the search
Embeddings, providers, fallbacks
The eval bar, the cost meter, the drift alarm
Type-safe everything
iOS + Android, native or cross
Whatever your infra already runs
Seekers benchmarked on hybrid retrieval
Districts of Bangladesh coverage
Industry verticals in match graph
Median match-API latency target
Eight weeks, fixed scope, eval suite at handoff. Direct LLM engineering on top of the K-Framework. Two Q3 slots remain.