Cost per call, metered
Every request carries a measured cost, attributed to a customer and an intent, visible on the same dashboard as latency.
Optimize cost, context, compute.
What a CEO/CTO needs to know
If no one can tell you the cost per request before the monthly bill arrives, the unit economics are running blind, and they may already be upside down.
Cost per intent metered against a budget, with an alert that fires before spend crosses the line.
The unit economics of an LLM feature are not "infinite tokens, never look at the bill." We model cost per intent, alert on regressions, and rotate to a smaller model when it saves money with no quality drop. Cost discipline is part of the architecture.
Every request carries a measured cost, attributed to a customer and an intent, visible on the same dashboard as latency.
A per-customer cost budget and an alert when a PR pushes cost up, so an 18k-token prompt change is caught in review, not in the invoice.
Is there a newer cheaper model, a distilled local fallback, or RAG that beats prompt-stuffing? Reviewed on a cadence, not after the crisis.
Four rungs from absent to production-grade. Level 3 is the target, and the only one that survives a real production incident.
Cost is unknown until the monthly bill. No attribution, no budget.
Total spend is watched, but not per intent or per customer.
Cost is metered, but there is no budget gate or regression alert.
Cost-per-intent budgets, regression alerts on PRs, and a quarterly model-cost review.
You do not need to read the code. Ask these questions and demand these artifacts. Vague answers are the finding.
The bill arrives at month end. Nobody knew a template change grew the prompt to 18k tokens. Per-customer compute has exceeded per-customer revenue for three weeks. The fix is rewriting prompt assembly.
We run the K-Framework against your AI build and hand you the gap list, ranked by what it will cost you in production.