01
Scope and fit
We decide where Microservices earns its place in your system, and where a simpler tool wins. No resume-driven architecture.
★ MicroservicesApplication Design Patterns8-week engagement
PATTERN · SERVICE BOUNDARIESMicroservices, only when the org needs them.
Microservices solve an organizational problem before a technical one. We split services along real boundaries, and we are honest when a well-built monolith is the better call.
DockerKubernetesGo
Cycle
8 weeks · fixed price
Stack
Services
Output
Production code + eval suite
Handoff
Full source ownership
[THE SHORT VERSION]
A team-scaling pattern, not a default.
Microservices let independent teams deploy independently, which is their real value. They also add network calls, distributed failure, and operational overhead. For most products a modular monolith ships faster and breaks less. We split only where team or scale boundaries justify it.
When it fits
- Multiple teams needing independent deploys
- Components with genuinely different scaling needs
- Decomposing a monolith that has hit real limits
When it does not
- Small teams and early products, where a monolith wins
[HOW WE BUILD IT]
How we build with Microservices.
02
Build on a tested foundation
We integrate Microservices against a foundation we trust: typed code, CI, and observability from the first commit. Boring infrastructure, modern surface.
03
Eval before launch
An eval suite proves the build behaves before it reaches a user. We measure, then ship.
04
Handoff with ownership
Your team gets the code, the tests, and a runbook. No lock-in to us or to a vendor framework.
[WHAT YOU GET]
What the engagement leaves behind.
8 wks
Problem to production
100%
Source ownership at handoff
Eval-first
Tested before it ships
0
Framework lock-in
APPLIED K-FRAMEWORKBring the problem.
Bring the problem.
We’ll bring the build.
Eight weeks, fixed price, eval suite at handoff. Senior engineers, full source ownership, no framework lock-in.